ELEVENTH WITNESS TO KNOCK VISION ANALYSED
Eleventh Witness.
Testimony of John Curry,
- a young boy, about six years old.
The child says he saw the images — beautiful images — the Blessed Virgin and St
Joseph. He could state no more than that he saw the fine images and the light,
and heard the people talk of them, and went upon the wall to see the nice things
and the lights.
NOTE: Even a child could notice the images were only things not people. What is
astounding is that the lad said they were images several weeks after the event.
Despite everybody saying three people appeared at the gable or three statues he
stated that they were images. He didn't let them pressure him to say what they
said. He said what he saw was a picture! Worse for Catholics, the testimony
tells us, "He could state no more than that he saw the fine images and the
light". Thus the priest writing the testimony was making it clear that Curry did
not actually say he saw the "the Blessed Virgin and St Joseph". This was the
priest's note. The priest was introducing his own interpretation. Curry was
allegedly put on the wall to see the images by Patrick Hill. He does not talk
about the items being statues or people but speaks of them as pictures. Curry's
sober testimony does not fit the detailed and obviously exaggerated account
given by Hill.
And why did he just go up on the wall? Why not closer? It is as if the vision
had to be looked at from a particular spot to be clear.